|
|
Updated 16 August 05!
I. Summary
The xFLS survey covers a 4 sq-deg region (17:18:00, +59:30:00) within
the northern continuous viewing zone of Spitzer. Inside the xFLS main
field a smaller verification strip of 0.25 sq-deg was observed with an
integration time of 4 times that of the main survey to characterize
the completeness and source reliability of the main survey. A total
of 27.7 hours of xFLS observations were taken in 2003 December for the
main and verification fields. An additional 16.8 hours of
observations within the xFLS main field were taken in 2005 May to
characterize the performance of the 70um array at warmer telescope
temperatures (9.5 K). These observations produced useful data at
70um, but the 160um data were not usable.
Coadded mosaics of the entire xFLS data sets along with the
corresponding coverage maps and uncertainty images are provided. The
mosaics are from the filtered products and have been background
subtracted. The absolute level of the uncertainty image has been
scaled to match the empirical noise within the mosaics. The coverage
map represents the effective number of input BCDs for each pixel of
the mosaic after outlier rejection. There are regions within the 70um
and 160um mosaics with zero coverage. The 70um image has gaps in the
south-west corner of the mosaic due to non-overlapping AORs. The
160um mosaics have a regular pattern of low coverage due to the
unusable block of five detectors and the low redundancy of these
observations.
Point-source catalogs were made for sources with S/N>7 at each
wavelength to insure high reliability. Sources near the edges or
within regions of very low coverage were deleted from the public
catalogs to avoid potentially spurious sources. In total, 687 70um
sources and 207 160um sources are cataloged. The 70um and 160um
catalogs are independent. The catalogs can be combined together or
with xFLS data at other wavelengths, depending on the specific
application. The average point source rms (1-sigma) is 2.8 mJy and 20
mJy for the 70um warm+main data and 160um main-survey data,
respectively. For the deeper verification regions, the point source
rms is 1.6 mJy at 70um and 10 mJy at 160um.
The images were examined visually to validate source detection and to
determine the appropriate method for deriving the flux densities on a
source by source basis. About 98% of the derived flux densities are
based on PRF fitting. The remaining sources mostly consist of bright
extended galaxies and/or close blends that are not well fitted by the
PRF. In these cases, large aperture measurements were made to derive
the total flux densities.
II. Images
III. Catalogs
Column Descriptions:
- Source Name
- RA(J2000) [decimal degree]
- Dec(J2000) [decimal degree]
- Radial positional uncertainty (1-sigma) [arcsec]
- Flux Density [mJy]
- Error on Flux Density [mJy]
The flux density errors include the 15% (70um) and 25% (160um)
uncertainty of the absolute flux density scale.
- Flag for flux measurement
A flag of ``prf'' indicates that the source was fitted by the PRF,
while a flag starting with an ``a'' indicates that an aperture
measurement was used (for cases of extended sources and/or close
blends). The number following the ``a'' gives the aperture
diameter in arcsec; e.g., a120 implies an aperture diameter of 120
arcsec. Sources with aperture flags ending with a ``m'' represent
bright galaxies not well fitted by the PRF and with nearby
companions; in these cases, the flux density of the bright galaxy
was derived by subtracting the PRF measurement(s) of the nearby
faint point source(s) from the total aperture flux density.
IV. Reference Paper
Addtional details may be found in Frayer
et al. 2005 (AJ)
Go back to XFLS page.
|