SSC Home Page

General Observer Investigations (GOs)


SPITZER HOME - SPITZER SCIENCE - INSTRUMENTS - SCIENCE USER SUPPORT - SEARCH

Table of Contents:
                GO overview
                Cycle-6
                Cycle-5
                Cycle-4
                Cycle-3
                Cycle-2
                Cycle-1
                Special categories of GO investigations
                Things GO investigations CAN'T do

GO overview

The General Observer (GO) program comprises the majority of community observing time on Spitzer. Calls for Proposals (CP) are released on an approximately annual basis.

The SSC Director reserves the right to change the scope and nature of GO proposals being solicited for each observing cycle. The scope of GO programs solicited for each observing cycle will be clearly stated in each CP.

The current schedule for GO observing cycles can be found on the Science Schedules page.

The SSC provides data analysis funding for approved GO investigations. The level of funding is determined by algorithmic means, and depends on the amount of observing time granted and the complexity of the data analyses tasks. Therefore, budgets do not need to be submitted as part of the original GO proposal.

Cycle-6

Cycle-5

Cycle-4

Cycle-3

Cycle-2

Cycle-1

Special categories of GO investigations

Targets of Opportunity (ToO)
In general, ToO proposals must be submitted to the SSC via the normal GO Calls for Proposals. The unique attributes and requirements of ToO observations are discussed in the ToO pages.

Generic Targets
Generic targets denote observations that fail to qualify as Targets of Opportunity; that is, they have more refined and predictive spatial and temporal information than ToOs. Generic targets can be described scientifically, but lack precise celestial coordinates or brightness estimates at the time of the proposal submission deadline. A Spitzer generic target can be selected from a complementary observing program with Spitzer, or with any other observatory, but one where the conditional observations (assumed to be under the control of the Spitzer Principal Investigator) are scheduled, but not yet executed or analyzed prior to the Spitzer proposal deadline. An example of a generic target involves Spitzer follow-up observations of targets culled from a ground-based supernova search program. In this case, the investigator would demonstrate that scheduled ground-based observing time is likely to yield enough supernovae to create a credible Spitzer proposal. However, the initial observations have not yet been made at the time of Spitzer proposal submission.

Multi-Cycle Observing Projects
Investigations requiring long temporal baselines, but small amounts of total observing time, can be a component of a proposed General Observer investigation. These requests must be limited to cases where it is clearly required to optimize the scientific return of the project. Multi-cycle observations are presumed to be repeated visits to the same target(s) with the same observing mode over several proposal cycles specified by the user, typically to monitor a source. Examples include astrometric observations or long-term monitoring of variable stars or active galactic nuclei.

Second-Look Observations
In some cases essential, predictable and pre-planned re-visits to objects and/or fields may be appropriate as part of a General Observer investigation. These second-look observations (SLOs) must be clearly justified as an integral part of a coherent GO investigation. Unlike long-term monitoring programs, SLOs are presumed to be a subsequent observation of a target with a different observing mode, with the intention of conducting a diagnostic observation related to an earlier discovery. Such re-visits should not be used to follow up, at will, interesting results uncovered in the initial observations. Such follow-up observations should be proposed as part of a GO program in a subsequent cycle. Generic targets (see above) could be a primary component of Spitzer second-look observations. For example, generic targets describe the situation where Spitzer imaging data yields discoveries of new objects for which Spitzer/IRS spectroscopic second-look observations are desired, based upon selection criteria specified in the original science proposal.

Things GO investigations CAN'T do

Snapshots
Snapshot exposures, consisting of relatively short observations and used to optimize the observational efficiency of Spitzer, cannot be proposed. "Snapshot" proposals refer to a concept perhaps more familiar to Hubble observers--in brief, this concept was initiated to fill gaps in the Hubble schedule that would otherwise have been idle time for the telescope. There is a paper in astro-ph describing the origin of the concept.

Snapshot proposals are not solicited for Spitzer, primarily because the observing efficiency of the telescope is so high with regularly scheduled observations.

Parallel Observations
It is not possible to conduct parallel observations with more than one science instrument on Spitzer.

Go back to Research Categories Overview page.


SPITZER HOME - SPITZER SCIENCE - INSTRUMENTS - SCIENCE USER SUPPORT - SEARCH

Contact Us
This file was last modified on Tue May 26 11:48:44 2009.
California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory NASA