|
IRAC: Best Observing Practices |
|
In this section, we present some advice for creating good IRAC
observations. For more complete information, and for the sections
mentioned below, consult the Spitzer
Observer's Manual. Further detailed examples are found in the Spitzer
Observation Planning
Cookbook.
Dithering vs. in-place repeatsDithering is used to eliminate array-dependent or transient artifacts from the true celestial map. A well-dithered map will mitigate the effect of pixel-to-pixel gain differences, which will average down when a celestial-coordinate mosaic is generated. Radiation hit rejection is greatly facilitated by taking highly-redundant observations. The SSC mosaicking software provides good radiation hit rejection in cases where each position on the sky is observed with several dithered frames. The medium- and large-scale dither patterns with five or more dithers per position are adequate for this. It is also possible to achieve sufficient redundancy, and accurate maps of large-scale structures, by making a raster map with spacing between rows and columns that is 1/2 array or less, together with a superposed (small-scale) cycling dither pattern.Scattered light from bright sources near the edge of the field of view sometimes cannot be avoided, but it can be prevented from contaminating multiple frames by using a dither pattern larger than the characteristic size of the regions that produce stray light. Scattered light is well-rejected by the post-BCD pipeline if dithering and mapping offsets are large enough, for example, with the medium and large dither patterns (but not small), to ensure that stars in subsequent images are moved out of the scattering zones, and the redundancy is high enough to allow for effective outlier rejection (five dithers is sufficient). We discourage using in-place repeats (successive frames taken at the same position), especially in observations that have less than ten different dither positions, both for the reasons mentioned above and also because the residual first-frame effect will lead to a bias pattern difference between the "repeats" and the "first frames" of a repeat set. Taking in-place repeats is recommended only in the case of time series measurements with stringent requirements for stability, such as observations of planet transits. In general, the better handling of pixel-to-pixel variations using dithers will more than compensate for the reduced amount of integration time; that is, the realized signal-to-noise level will be higher using N-1 dithered observations than N observations with repeats. (In-place repeats are specified in the AOT window under "For Each Pointing/ Number of Frames;" dithers are specified lower in the AOT window under "Dither Pattern.") Depending on the number of bright sources in your planned field, and the placement of your observation in the schedule relative to other observations that may have bright sources, there may be persistent images in the arrays during your observations. The calibration data (flats and darks) are carefully planned to avoid such artifacts, and they are erased by anneals every 12 hr. If your observation is contaminated by persistent images, the effect on the final data quality is reduced in a dithered observation by at least a factor of 1/N, where N is the number of dithers. Greater reduction occurs when robust averaging (outlier rejection) is used. Taking into account possible residuals of the first frame effect and image artifacts due to bright sources, we recommend that sensitive, background-limited maps be made using either as many dithers as possible, or a fine map grid combined with the cycling dither pattern. Shallow, read-noise-limited observations, or raster maps specially designed to identify phenomena with a certain time-dependence (such as asteroid motion), may be best done with combinations of small dither patterns and small map steps. The small scale dither patterns should only be used in conjunction with mapping using 1/3-2/3 array offsets. The small scale dither patterns do not provide sufficient redundancy under other circumstances.
HDR modeIt is possible that bright sources will saturate the array at the frame time you choose to meet your sensitivity goal. To allow sensitive observations without losing dynamic range, we provide a high dynamic range (HDR) option. When this option is selected, IRAC will take extra frames with frame times shorter than your selected frame time. HDR mode is recommended if the target or nearby sources will saturate in the desired frametime. The short frame data are very useful in recovering the photometry of saturated sources, fitting PRFs to saturated sources, and in removing artifacts due to bright saturated sources. HDR mode is only slightly more expensive in observing time than the full frame counterpart.
Stellar photometry modeWhen observing objects that are considerably brighter in channels 1 and 2 than in channels 3 and 4, but not saturating with frame times >0.4 sec, use of the stellar photometry mode is recommended. Short undithered frames are taken in channels 1 and 2 simultaneously with longer frames in channels 3 and 4.
SubarraySubarray mode is useful for observing single, very bright sources, and for obtaining high temporal resolution, since sets of 64 frames are taken back-to- back, with no gap between frames. The saturation limit is much higher in the subarray mode.
MappingIn most cases, we recommend mapping in array coordinates since the sky coverage can be custom-tailored, independent of the date when the observation is scheduled. A celestial map grid can yield highly non-uniform coverage (including gaps), unless the individual pointings are spaced closely together. There are cases where a celestial grid is preferred, specifically for mapping a highly elongated region (see example in 6.2.4.4). We recommend that all observers considering a celestial grid inspect their survey coverage for a range of possible spacecraft roll angles using Spot visualizations. Be aware that away from the ecliptic poles, not all position angles are available over all positions on the sky. If a large observation can be broken into separate rectangular map grids, as is necessary when the total map duration is more than 8 hr, then individual AORs for each map "tile" can use the same central target position and a "map center offset." Allow for some overlap between tiles, both for calibration and for inefficiencies in the way tiles mesh together.
Observing near bright targetsIf you observe a target next to a very bright target and want to image it with all four arrays, and it will be impossible to avoid having the bright target in one of the arrays (e.g., due to the small roll angle range), it may be better to make the observation in two separate AORs, imaging one channel pair at a time, or to take more frames (with dithers) than would be strictly needed for sensitivity purposes, to beat down persistent images. Remember to justify this in your proposal.A very common and challenging type of observation is to search for a faint source near a much brighter one. The choice of observing strategy and assessment of the technical feasibility for such a search requires great care. First, it is important to determine the brightness of the point response function (PRF) of the main source at the distance where the putative companion is being sought. The Table below gives the intensity of the PRF, normalized to the peak for a source centered in a pixel, at several distances from the center. A well-designed experiment will be able to "cancel" the PRF down to a certain level. For example, if the PRF is down by a factor of one thousand from the peak at the distance being searched, it is plausible to search for features at a level of 1x10-4 if some type of PRF removal is done. And, furthermore, having knowledge of the potential shape of the companion (e.g., a point source or disk) will obviously discriminate it from the remaining PRF of the bright source. Remember that the Poisson noise of the bright source at the location of the bright target will always limit the accuracy of the PRF removal. Table: Values are derived from 5x (0.24"/pixel) oversampled PRFs created from observations of calibration stars. I/Io is calculated as the flux density /pixel in a 1 pixel annulus at the respective radii divided by the flux density measured in the central pixel. Encircled Energy is the ratio of the flux density enclosed within the representative apertures to the flux density in a 12.2" aperture.
Here is a recommended strategy for this type of observation. Center the bright source on the array, and observe it with a dither pattern with medium scale factor. Use a pattern with good subpixel sampling, to enable future super-resolution techniques; for example, consider the 9-point Random (1/3-pixel sampling) or the 16-point spiral (1/4-pixel sampling). Use the HDR mode, so that there are short frames at the exact same position as the long frames. These may help with centroiding, because they will be less saturated in the core. Use a long enough frame time for the long frames so that you will gain the required sensitivity on the putative faint source in one (or a few) frames, preferably without saturating the primary source over more than a few pixels. Finally, and probably most importantly, design the experiment as a pair of AORs, with timing constraints such that the source will be seen at two very different roll angles. The range of possible roll angles depends on the ecliptic latitude of the source and must be verified using Spot visualizations near the beginning and end of the visibility windows for a given source. Typically the range of roll angles is about 20 degrees. The PRF will remain fixed in array coordinates, so the basic calibrated images at the two epochs can be subtracted. While any detector artifacts and most of the light from the bright source should subtract out, two images of any real faint object(s) should remain.
Observing single faint sourcesDespite latent mitigation procedures, observations of faint sources may be affected by long term latents from prior observations of bright sources. For observations of single faint sources, we suggest offsetting the target position by 5-10 arcseconds to reduce the chance of placing a latent from a previous observation of a bright star with the same dither pattern as your science. This offset is most easily accomplished by using a cluster target with array coordinate offsets, entering the offset as the first (and only) cluster position and then selecting the option to observe offsets only.Confusion and other background issuesIf you know the accurate (better than 0.6 arcsec) positions of your sources and you are only interested in measuring their fluxes, then the classical confusion limit is not really relevant. It is generally straightforward to align an IRAC image in celestial coordinates to 0.6 arcsec, and often 0.2 arcsec accuracy can be achieved when there are multiple 2MASS sources in the field.To separate faint asteroids from more distant targets, it is a good idea to observe your field of view at least twice, separated by a few hours at least, if your source lies at a low ecliptic latitude (within 15 degrees of the Ecliptic or so).
|
help@spitzer.caltech.edu http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/irac/bop.html