SSC Home Page

Legacy Program: Progress Reviews


SPITZER HOME || SPITZER SCIENCE || INSTRUMENTS || SCIENCE USER SUPPORT || SEARCH

+ - General Information
- Spitzer News
- Research Categories
- Science Schedules
- Advisory Groups
- Observing Rules
- Legacy Program
- First-Look Survey
+ - Observatory & Instruments
- Overview
- PCS
- IRAC
- IRS
- MIPS
- AOTs
+ - Science User Support
- Proposal Kit
- Documents
- Tools
+ - Approved Programs
- Observing Schedules
+ - Data Archives / Analysis
- Science Archive Access
- Post-BCD Tools
+ - Data Analysis Funding
- Information
+ - FAQ
- Search site

Progress Reviews

In order to maximize the likelihood of success for each Legacy Science project, the SSC conducts reviews at key points during the duration of each project. These reviews assess the progress being made by the teams, identify any problems that arise, and identify remedial actions (as necessary).

An Observing Strategy Review took place at the SSC in September 2001. The purpose of this review was to assess the team's plan for conducting Spitzer observations, and to optimize the plan (where possible). This review occurred one month prior to the deadline for submission of completed AORs to the SSC. At a subsequent Data Plan Review, in May-June 2002, teams will describe their post-pipeline data processing plans (if proposed), and their development of analysis algorithms and/or software tools (if proposed).

A post-launch Progress Review will occur during Stage Two, approximately six months after the launch of Spitzer, or three months after commissioning of the relevant observing modes is completed. At this review, each team must validate their observing strategy, based on the analysis of early data taken as part of their Legacy Science project. Each team should also demonstrate progress towards their proposed higher-level data processing tasks, in the form of prototype analysis software.

In addition to these Reviews, teams should regularly inform the SSC of progress towards their milestones during the intervening periods. For each project that has proposed post-pipeline product development, the SSC will also assess each team's progress when receiving intermediate data products and/or software tools semi-annually.

A final Progress Review will take place at the end of Stage Two, on a schedule that will be unique to each Legacy Science team. At this review, each team must deliver the final version of their committed post-pipeline processed data products (and explanatory documentation) to the SSC for verification and archiving. If the teams proposed to deliver higher-level data analysis software tools, the final versions of these products (and explanatory documentation) must also be delivered to the SSC by the conclusion of Stage Two.

Go back to Legacy information home page or on to Frequently Asked Questions.


SPITZER HOME || SPITZER SCIENCE || INSTRUMENTS || SCIENCE USER SUPPORT || SEARCH

help@spitzer.caltech.edu
http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/legacy/history/progress.html
This file was last modified on Thu Apr 24 16:47:18 2008.

California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory NASA